Recent episodes of unidentified drone overflights in Denmark and several other European countries have highlighted a new vulnerability in aviation infrastructures. Temporary airport closures, hijacked flights and massive traffic disruptions show that the threat posed by drones now goes beyond mere local nuisance, and requires a coordinated response on a European scale.
Why drone overflights threaten European airports
The growing number of incidents involving unidentified drones creates a direct risk for the airport security and continuity of air traffic. Light aircraft, sometimes remotely piloted from outlying areas, can cause temporary platform closures, as witnessed at Aalborg, Copenhagen and other sites. Beyond the immediate operational impact, these events highlight a wider issue: the difficulty for authorities and operators to detect, identify and neutralize drones before they reach sensitive areas.
The "anti-drone wall" concept: an ambitious technological response
Faced with these repeated incursions, the European Union is planning to set up a coordinated system, known as the "anti-drone walldesigned to detect, identify and, if necessary, neutralize illegal aircraft before they reach airports. This wall is not a physical barrier, but an integrated system combining acoustic sensors, low-altitude radar, radio frequency solutions and geolocation capabilities. The main objective is to provide preventive coverage along sensitive routes and the EU's external borders to reduce reaction times and limit the impact on traffic.
In practical terms, the implementation of such a system requires the massive deployment of sensors and the interconnection of data between member states and airport operators. By centralizing alerts, it would be possible to anticipate suspicious trajectories and coordinate appropriate interception measures, without compromising the safety of commercial flights or military operations.
Detection technologies and neutralization options
The solutions available today are based on a range of complementary technologies. Detection relies on radar specially designed for small targets, optical and infrared sensors for visual identification, and radio signal analysis systems to pinpoint control links. In terms of neutralization, options range from radio jamming to interrupt remote control or GPS transmissions, to interception systems using "hunter" drones or nets, to more sophisticated measures incorporating behavioral analysis to differentiate a threat from an authorized flight.
The effectiveness of an "anti-drone wall" will depend on the ability of states and operators to harmonize technical standards, share data in real time and define clear rules of engagement for the use of neutralization means, to avoid collateral consequences for the public and air traffic.
Legal and operational issues for the EU and airports
The creation of a pan-European system raises major legal issues. The use of countermeasures, such as jamming frequencies or shooting down drones, falls within a strict regulatory framework that varies from country to country. The EU will have to propose a harmonized framework allowing coordinated actions while guaranteeing respect for individual freedoms and radio communications legislation. Furthermore, operational implementation requires clear responsibilities to be defined between civil authorities, airport operators and law enforcement agencies, without compromising the sovereignty of member states.
The other concrete challenge is the integration of these systems with existing infrastructures. Airports are complex environments where navigation systems, communications and ground operations coexist. Any anti-drone solution must be tested to avoid interference with aeronautical radios, navigation systems and passenger Wi-Fi. Last but not least, the training of surveillance teams and the implementation of rapid alert and action procedures will be essential if the system is to be truly operational.
Consequences for travellers and air traffic
For passengers, the prospect of an "anti-drone wall" means a promise of fewer cancellations and disruptions, but also the possibility of tighter controls around airports. Travellers could see additional security procedures on the outskirts of hubs, and occasional restrictions on access to the surrounding area in the event of an alert. For airlines and airport managers, the investment is twofold: financial, for the acquisition and integration of technologies, and organizational, for interdepartmental coordination and compliance with the new rules.
Key information
Flywest reports that the Nordic incidents have reignited the European debate on drone safety, and that the EU is considering an integrated detection and interception system dubbed the "anti-drone wall". The solution combines low-altitude radar, optical sensors, radio signal analysis and neutralization capabilities. The project's success will depend on regulatory harmonization, real-time data sharing and careful deployment to avoid interference with aeronautical systems. For users, the stakes are clear: protect the flight safety while keeping air traffic flowing smoothly.
English 
French